- Joined
- Aug 2, 2000
- Messages
- 11,502
That system, used on the Si and the 2 litre 405 SRI is the best ever, never had the slightest problem.
Dual ignitor firing two waste spark coilsWhat system are you referring to, Graham?
Ignition of course, what was being talked about!What system are you referring to, Graham?
Ignition of course, what was being talked about!
I think you'll find it's an inductive sensor, as per attached, even though it's 3 core. The 3rd wire being the shield. Great progress, keep us posted.The crank sensor is from my Si gearbox. I originally thought it was just an inductive sensor so I wired up my multicore at the ECU as +/- going straight into the ECU. But I am pretty sure being a 3-pin it is a hall-effect. Lucky I used 3-core. Reading some old posts Peter suggests using a resistor in series to drop the voltage. Not sure if this is still the case. If I can use the 8v supply from the PS1000 I just need to unspare one wire and terminate it.
I've always thought the internal MAP sensor has the same resolution and range as an external sensor. Certainly for an NA application. I'd rather use more 4mm hose than run another three wires.We all want a remote MAP sensor don't we?
That does look very neat.Finally looking like an engine bay again. If I had a smaller battery I could have mounted the PS reservoir in its factory location, but deleting the AFM made buckets of space to jam it between the battery.
I'd always go for the three wires and a shorter vacuum hose (with an appropriate restrictor 'pill') so the MAP signal reacts quicker than it does at the end of a long hose.I've always thought the internal MAP sensor has the same resolution and range as an external sensor. Certainly for an NA application. I'd rather use more 4mm hose than run another three wires.