Somebody knew and they did nothing.Along with the Fuego, 18, 12 etc, they have a fundamental design flaw with where the steering rack is placed - right behind the engine block. The engine being slung way out front means the rack is pushed back as soon the engine moves back, and without a properly collapsing steering column and suitably rigid dash support, the steering wheel ends up under your chin and breaking your neck....
Haakon,ps - thanks Yoda![]()
Totally different drive train layout. Also a newer design where crash performance was a little more included in the design processSomebody knew and they did nothing.
Haakon,
your too kind.
Some of us put survival at a premium.
Interesting the Peugeot 306 do not have this problem, rack set lower.
Settle down tiger! I'm as big a fan of the 25 as anyoneR25 first released in 1983.
Let's say it took a conservative 5 years to design.
That makes it a 43 year old design.
Fall off your high horses and stop applying modern FEA safety to something like 8 generations old.
Accept the fact that they weren't the best in design and drive accordingly.
Where is your bleating about sub-quality/standard tyres that are allowed to be sold?
precisely why I'm running a fleet or RX4 Scenics as the kids learn to drive.Settle down tiger! I'm as big a fan of the 25 as anyoneJust think its not really a good option as a daily anymore - I love the 25, but I love not being dead more... It was about average for safety in its day, but the road toll was also pretty horrific back then too!
I'm not really applying modern standards to the 25, more commenting on what's my priority - I'll happily punt around in a 25 for the occasional drive and roll the dice, but for daily ill stack the cards more in my favour and drive modern.
I remember having a speeding commodore running a red light in St Kilda one day and missing the front bumper of my R10 by inches... I parked it up and put the Rover 2000 back on the road after seeing my life flash before my eyes!Later model Clios impressed me with with their rollover protection.
There was a post a few years ago where a clio ended up roof first into a pole and the drivers walked away.
I remind myself of how dangerous the little RWD renaults are.
The Dauphine was well known for diving nose down and tail up squashing its occupants from the roof down. The Dauphine is all crumple zone.
Renault have lead the way since the 60s and before for crumple zones so it's not like they weren't thinking of safety.
I don't think anyone could have imagined how safe cars would be today, breaking the 5 star rating system.
I remember having a speeding commodore running a red light in St Kilda one day and missing the front bumper of my R10 by inches... I parked it up and put the Rover 2000 back on the road after seeing my life flash before my eyes!
![]() Cliquez pour agrandir |
![]() |
![]() |
Do you have one to sell ? Sell yours |
Refund within 14 days, buyer pays return shipping cost | Details |