4speed auto or 5 speed manual

Thanks Ray - I think I may have found a shift mechanism in Canberra but need to confirm this. It is from a 504 wagon - hopefully it is the shorter style. I'll bear in mind that you have one and will let you know later in the week if I need yours.

Thanks,
James
 
Regarding STI springs. Up to about 1984 the STI springs are the same as GR/SR springs, but I think some 85 model STI springs might be the same as series 1 GTI springs.

Having tried both 195/60 tyres and 195/65 tyres, I think the 60 series tyres are more responsible for the loss of ride quality in the GTI versus the STI, than the springs.

The GTI springs although stiffer than other Pug springs, are still soft when compared with "soft" springs made by other manufacturers. The GTI front spring rate of about 85lbs/in is softer than almost any other non-Peugeot spring, including those fitted to sub-1000kg economy cars. The rear springs are 254lbs/in, which is a fairly average spring rate for rear springs on other medium sedans.

Dave
 
Taking into account leverage, David?

Spring rates on struts are easy to compare, but when it comes to rear suspensions there are other factors... if you see what I mean.

James, it's here if you need it, I'm away for five days, but I'll be back Sunday. I'm on 0411 280 267 if you need anything.
 
Ray Bell:
Taking into account leverage, David?

Spring rates on struts are easy to compare, but when it comes to rear suspensions there are other factors... if you see what I mean.

James, it's here if you need it, I'm away for five days, but I'll be back Sunday. I'm on 0411 280 267 if you need anything.
Ray,

Yeah, I know what you mean, the back wheel rates could be harder than other cars although they don't feel too bad to me, and I find alot of other cars too stiff.

I've seen the wheel rate figures for the 505 turbo/GTI and even then the front rates seem low when compared with those of a 900kg Ford Escort.

Dave

<small>[ 19 August 2002, 06:09 PM: Message edited by: fiveohs ]</small>
 
You soon find out when you go playing with various struts that Peugeots have heaps of pre-load on their springs. That's why they can be so soft...

The benefit, of course, is that the wheels can follow the road.
 
Thanks fellows for the info. My previous car was an 83 STI. Most people who rode in it said it had the most comfortable seats and ride they had ever experienced (obviously they had not been in a D series) At my age(60+) I drive more sedately now, and prefer comfort to ultimate handling! How about Michelins that did 100000 and front brake pads 110000 kms? My 54 Fiat 1100 did 5000 kms.on Michelins - mostly sideways!- them were the days.

So, it's softer springs (seats too if possible but with seat belt anchors on the seat that could be difficult) or a change of car. Incidently I've tried 65 series tyres on the back with no discernable difference. Seriously thinking of another Citroen, BX or Xantia. Had an ID and GS before.

The STI was the most reliable car I have ever owned-only major work after 325000kms was a seized clutch thrust brg.(the clutch was still working fine, but the noise!) However the rust was winning the battle of the body, and the original front dampers were a bit tired!
 
Top