Just while harrisonati is online - always wondered whether the 30DGS Weber from GS Citroens wouldn't suit 203/403s, both being around 1200cc ...manifold ( suitably configured - will sketch it later ) and all.
The best indicator for carburettor choke size is your target power output. All things being equal (which they seldom are!), power will depend on the volume of air fuel mixture passing per unit time. Thus, if you're targeting about 60bhp+ from your 203 or 403, then the GS carby should be OK. Remember that GS power outputs were Net while 203 & 403s were Gross. Also, in my experience, sub-optimal choke size/s can still yield significant power increases. SOLEX published choke sizing fomulas many years ago, but I haven't seen any for Webers.Just while harrisonati is online - always wondered whether the 30DGS Weber from GS Citroens wouldn't suit 203/403s, both being around 1200cc ...manifold ( suitably configured - will sketch it later ) and all.
That's a good idea, however:Just as another alternative, and as you're already talking Italian and not French carburettors.
The small staged 2 barrel Hitachi carburettors are a fine little unit. These came out on Datsun 1200s, 120Ys, Sunnys etc. Subaru also used them on their early flat fours. A 120Y is rated at 69 BHP and they have very good fuel consumption. Different stud pattern to the other 2 carbys mentioned, but anyone half handy can knock up an adaptor plate. I usually make my adaptors out of thick plastic cutting board. Easy to work with but tough as, and you get the added bonus that it serves double duty as a heat insulator as well.
I've bought a few of the replica Hitachi carburettors off EBay and they run sweet straiģht out of the box. Manual choke, no emissions gear. I had a quick look and they can still be found for under $100 delivered (from within Australia).
Just my 2 cents worth, always found they were a much better option than some flogged out 50 year old unit. This one's $91 delivered.
View attachment 221006
I've no idea if the factory Nissan claim is accurate or not? Nissan did supply engine dyno charts to road testers of the time indicating it made what they claimed it did.That's a good idea, however:
Is the replica true to the original?Some caution should be taken over the power claimed by some Japanese manufacturers in that era - some claims would seem to be optimistic by a significant margin.
The cutting board in the photo I had to buy unfortunately. When I worked at the abattoir they used green HDPE material for cutting boards about 1" thick. When they were due for replacement I'd get a couple and take them down to the the maintenance department. They'd mill both sides for me and I'd end up with dead flat material 3/4" thick. I'd use them up over several years making 4 barrel carburettor and supercharger adaptors. It is bloody good stuff, rigid, machines beautifully, petrol resistant. I've also made adaptors out of a good quality piece of timber on more than one occasion.you really did mean cutting board!
Hadn’t realised it was so comprehensive - received wisdom at the time was Datsun had just reinforced the bits that could be made to brake.
Funny, just read Wheels and Motor had morris major ( 998cc ? ) at 50 bhp and mini ( 848cc? ) at 34 bhp respectively, before oxenford conversions.
The Morris Major had BMC 'B' engine of 1489cc. My reason for questioning the power claimed for some engine related to the venturi size Vs power calculation. I didn't want to start WW3!you really did mean cutting board!
Hadn’t realised it was so comprehensive - received wisdom at the time was Datsun had just reinforced the bits that could be made to brake.
Funny, just read Wheels and Motor had morris major ( 998cc ? ) at 50 bhp and mini ( 848cc? ) at 34 bhp respectively, before oxenford conversions.
"... one current project chez nous is a 404 engine used in ARC in the 60’s. Was built by Repco racing for Regan’s at the time when they were doing the Repco Brabham engine. They created a four port head in the usual way ( grinding out and refilling plenum etc ).
THe ports on this head, into which went much thought from smart people are really relatively small.
Will be interesting to see how it goes. Head currently off being cleaned up and flow benched ..."
Andrew
Me either (WW3) and I apologise if you read my post as argumentative, that certainly wasn't my intent.The Morris Major had BMC 'B' engine of 1489cc. My reason for questioning the power claimed for some engine related to the venturi size Vs power calculation. I didn't want to start WW3!
I thought the position was that cars were taxed in Britain based on the RAC power calculation which took bore into account, but not stroke - so you could make a bigger more powerful engine without increasing the tax rating if you only increased the stroke. Hence lots of long stroke British engine designs. The RAC power was quite separate to what was advertised by marketing departments. I thought the advertised claims from that time were generally overstated - eg, Jaguar claimed 265hp for an e-type but is it generally accepted that a standard e-type produces nothing like 265hp?i dont know how much truth there is in it, but my dad used to say that a lot of British cars were long stroke because the stoke was a factor in the calks for HP and cars were taxed by HP so the lower the rated horsepower the cheaper it was for rego , so i suspect that horsepower rating could possibly have been down rated to make it more marketable for budget orientated buyers ,34 HP for a mini seems awfully low but spose it isnt lugging a heavy body around !
The old (British) RAC system of taxable HP was calculated on the bore diameter of the engine.i dont know how much truth there is in it, but my dad used to say that a lot of British cars were long stroke because the stoke was a factor in the calks for HP and cars were taxed by HP so the lower the rated horsepower the cheaper it was for rego , so i suspect that horsepower rating could possibly have been down rated to make it more marketable for budget orientated buyers ,34 HP for a mini seems awfully low but spose it isnt lugging a heavy body around !
Oooh thanks Greenpeace,my mazda1000 has two of these on as standard,handy to know as a couple of carby places I contacted a couple of years ago gave me the not interested not available response..jimJust as another alternative, and as you're already talking Italian and not French carburettors.
The small staged 2 barrel Hitachi carburettors are a fine little unit. These came out on Datsun 1200s, 120Ys, Sunnys etc. Subaru also used them on their early flat fours. A 120Y is rated at 69 BHP and they have very good fuel consumption. Different stud pattern to the other 2 carbys mentioned, but anyone half handy can knock up an adaptor plate. I usually make my adaptors out of thick plastic cutting board. Easy to work with but tough as, and you get the added bonus that it serves double duty as a heat insulator as well.
I've bought a few of the replica Hitachi carburettors off EBay and they run sweet straiģht out of the box. Manual choke, no emissions gear. I had a quick look and they can still be found for under $100 delivered (from within Australia).
Just my 2 cents worth, always found they were a much better option than some flogged out 50 year old unit. This one's $91 delivered.
View attachment 221006
I remember when older Subaru 4WDs (Brumbys etc) were "traditionally" modified (ie: before everyone just chucked a FI turbo in them) fitting a 500 cfm 2 barrel Holley was a very popular mod.In my misspent youth doing something for minimal expenditure meant quite a lot. At the time, running a succession of Standard 8's & 10's for transport, I discovered that one could just about put any carby you liked on the input side. I ran a twin choke Stromberg from a Ford v8 flathead for quite some time, that's a carb meant to feed a 221 cub in donk on a teensy 1L or less outfit.
It drove better with more ooph, that's techno for 'go', and, surprisingly, gave me better overall economy win win...
With the help of the accelerator pump it didn't need any choke either !
Back then, you could fill the Standard's tank from empty to full for less than a quid [$2] !!
Bob