many Renaults and parts *STOLEN*, Epping VIC :(

Before everyone gets too high on their horses. I would remind that this is quite a specialised area with lots of legal pitfalls and sidetracks on proving ownership, especially when the property is contracted for care in the hands of third parties, or certain conditions exist that may be written or implied to an extent they can have an impact.

I was fortunate to learn a lot of those pitfalls and ways around them, through my then Boss Detective Sergeant Colin Hammond who spent years in the Victoria Police Stolen Motor Vehicle Squad investigating many complicated transactions that often spent years in Civil Litigation to recover property to their rightful owners.

There are many processes to go through before rights are established sufficient to seize or even detain property. He bought a lot of that experience and expertise to the CIB Dealers Squad where I worked for quite a number of years and that also helped in sorting out many ownership issues for high value jewellery and equipment seized by police.

At least most of those items were quite small by comparison, but of high value. Sometimes you wished you hadn't seized or taken into possession some property as in some instances it had to remain in our custody and care for many years while courts both criminal and civil made rulings on restoration and in some cases an order might also specify damages.

Then there are cases where theft (an essential element in some return of property orders cannot be established) due to civil elements/transactions/promises intervene, and those that dealt with property can also resort to civil litigation to try and reinforce their own claims as well.

So quite a legal minefield, and not one for any to travel unless you have unlimited monies to expend. So just some caution unless your are prepared or motivated to underwrite Vivid's already high cost incurred in this event. Hopefully these later developments will help him in the resolution and restoration of that property to his care. Certainly helpful if anyone has information or knows where individual cars are now located and the chain of custody etc. back to the original transactor.

Ken
 
Either way. A police report is a police report. It is just a record of a statement by some dude (you). The police take down whatever you have to say. For the purpose of having a record that you said that. What they do after that is another matter, but if you show up in a police station and want to report some property stolen they have to take a report. Not to investigate if you have a civil claim or whatever. That is a job for lawyers not policemen.

My guess is they didn't want to take you seriously because you were some dude on the phone. If you had been in there with documents I think they would have had less of a chance to dismiss you. I can sort of see what they were thinking (this can be some dude off his face who thinks aliens kidnapped his granma in a flying saucer" or something like that). Well, doing business over the phone is hard.
 
Last edited:
Either way. A police report is a police report. It is just a record of a statement by some dude (you). The police take down whatever you have to say. For the purpose of having a record that you said that. What they do after that is another matter, but if you show up in a police station and want to report some property stolen they have to take a report. Not to investigate if you have a civil claim or whatever. That is a job for lawyers not policemen.
my understanding is a statement is not a police report. I was told by the officer that they needed to decide ( and told me they would proceed ) if a report would be made.
 
Well, okay. Even if you only made a statement, they have to have some record of it the same way they do when you report your car stolen or your house broken into so you can have your insurance pay.
 
Well, okay. Even if you only made a statement, they have to have some record of it the same way they do when you report your car stolen or your house broken into so you can have your insurance pay.
insurance definitely want an official police report. The sergeants words, "we need to establish a crime has been committed, and the nature before we file a report, and forward it for investigation"
 
I think they have had enough time and sufficient proof that a crime has been committed since you had to buy back your car from someone after you did not sell it to anyone.

Let alone that if you go and declare your car stolen they don't "establish" anything. They just give you the report number and you take that to your insurer.
 
Hey guys, Just an update now the court case is over, and the outcome I haven't yet come to terms with.

A person living at the property known to be an alcoholic and heavy gambler was charged a couple of months ago.

I have had trouble coming to terms with the outcome.

Constable Gundry got my case over the line, and I'd like to thank him and other members of the forum for their assistance, particularly Ken Andrews who contacted the police commissioner, John Faine who allowed me to talk his ear off and give some really great advice, and Andrew Davis who went above and beyond, initially reporting the theft on my behalf, and helping me recover the 1969 16TS.

I can reveal his name now, its Mende Jovcevski

A conviction has been recorded, against his name but it's little comfort..

Unfortunately everything else is outstanding, there was one of my late 16s in a very sad state still at the wreckers but I had no where to store it, although I was told I could come and pick it up after the police spoke with the wrecker. Of course the wrecker "had a burglury where all their documents went missing". yea right, they are known to be dodgy as f** at those wreckers.

The only information I was able to extract from the wrecker was that the parts and several vehicles (the bulk of the stuff) went to Ballarat, and the trail ends there.

I'll leave the quote from Senior Constable Travis Gundry who took over the case after litterally years of dumfuckery...

Hi David,

I wanted to let you know that at the contest mention hearing on Tuesday we were successful in getting a guilty plea from Mende for the theft of your cars and containers. This has avoided a contested trial where all witnesses would have been required to attend and give evidence.

Unfortunately, the magistrate was not willing to make a restitution order on the day and advised the best way for you to recover lost money would be to litigate against Mende in civil court. The criminal conviction has been recorded against him and the test for success in civil court is lower than criminal court. My advice to you would be to seek out your own legal advice to determine a way forward for you.

In terms of punishment for Mende. The magistrate stated that if it wasn’t for the seriousness of his terminal brain cancer prognosis, he would have sent him to jail. But in consideration of his health, he was fined. It will come as cold comfort to you I’m sure, so many years after your loss.

I wish you the best of luck, David.

I'm now trying to follow up the burgundy 69 R10 which I watched get sold, and the police had done nothing to date.


This is the last I saw of it, Scott Pigdon doesn't return any of my emails or correspondance so I don't care much if he's outed here. The constable is following up the few leads I do have.
Untitled.jpg
 
I don't blame you for having trouble coming to terms with that outcome! It is very strange to my mind.

I understand the magistrate being compassionate regarding the brain cancer, but that's about where my understanding ends. I'd be interested to know if that's the only part that you understand, too.

As for Scott Pidgin, I'm not on Facebook so I could only read some of the comments. I wasn't willing to sign up just to read the rest of them to see if there was anything worth knowing. But from those I could see, I wonder if it is worth sending a message to any of those people. Maybe one (or more) of them knows Scott personally and will be more favourable to hearing and learning your side of things. Surely it can't hurt. Or is my faith in human nature misplaced?

Andrew
 
Well, some outcome at least but mostly cold comfort. What a saga! I'm glad at least that you've had the belated satisfaction of some action being taken.

I agree with Mr 505604.
 
Restitution orders against losers never get any money back but it would have helped getting some parts back. Decisions by magistrates are often hard to follow. Seem to be chosen because of their sympathetic understanding of criminals. When we want Judge Jeffries.
Scrap dealers are mostly untrustworthy sorts of people. Some worse than others.
This is why people who have old cars parked in paddocks and sheds don't want people sniffing around them. These "internet explorers" who "find" abandoned cars and buildings are nothing more than thieving trespassers.
I was always of the impression that the buyer of a stolen car lost it. Be wary of going down the lawyer path, easy to be led into expensive action with no result.
 
cold comfort about sums it up. I'm also so disappointed that by the time someone was willing to investigate (2 coppers later) any usable evidence was long gone, and recovery of anything becomes impossible.
 
Top