Thanks everyone for putting me straight. Yes it it just needed under the bonnet to test the torque coverter pressure with engine running, at two different rev rates. From the sound of it the gauges suggested by Col would be better than my initial question and thanks to Jo, Bob and Jaahn for guidance on the fittings to go with it. It seems odd for a decent (or decent enough) gauge to be so cheap? I would go for something reading at or above 250psi given I need to read at least up to 145 psi.
Edit: the testing point on the torque converter takes a standard 6mm threaded bolt (pitch is same as buying a 6mm bolt from bunnings so whatever that is 1mm or 1.25 can check later). So need a 6mm takeoff there To 1/4 inch at gauge.
For those interested in my underlying problem:
At present we cannot engage any gears in the GS with the engine running (a slight deficiency as you would acknowledge) because of some flaw in the "hydraulically automated clutch" or 'Convertisseur' setup (hybrid auto-manual gearbox with friction clutch operated by hydraulics switched by gear lever movements, no clutch pedal).
The electrical side consists of a set of contact switches at the gearbox that provide an earth path which is 'open' (not conducting) when the car is in gear and closed (conducting to earth) when car (gearstick) is in neutral; this circuit runs via a normally open relay (and the ignition switch) to provide current to the famous 'Electroswitch' which is a hydraulic solenoid that switches torque converter fluid (driven by an internal pump) between two flow states: 1. pressurising the hydraulic clutch (unable to change gear) when in gear with the electroswitch NOT energised (a spring returns an internal rod to the position where fluid flows to pressurise the pressure plate) and 2: de-pressurising the clutch when in neutral (allowing the gears to be changed) - in this case the contact switches on the gearbox should be closed and the relay energised which should energise the electroswitch solenoid, pushing the distribution rod to the position where the hydraulic fluid bypasses the pressure plate allowing the clutch springs to decouple the motor from the gearbox, hence gears may be changed.
It is possible there is a flaw in the electrics that means the electroswitch is not getting switched on when in neutral to activate depressurise mode, or it is possible something is wrong with the fluid side.
A pressure gauge can be plugged into the torque converter to check the pressure from the gear driven internal eccentric pump. If the pump has failed or the pressure is not high enough then the factory instruction is to basically replace the whole torque converter unit (as long as a small filter is not blocked which I believe isn't). Hence wanting to check the pressure to hopefully rule out a major issue.
On the electrical side, and being a Citroen, of course, the contact switch box is tiny (about the size of a matchbox) with a delicate mechanism consisting of 4 sets of points - one for each gear 1,2,3 and R - and mounted on a practically inaccessible spot behind the motor/Gearbox in the gear lever tunnel area and only able to be checked (under the bonnet not from inside the car) by removing the gear stick assembly and lying on top of the engine And somehow still changing gear by the stub out of the gearbox (which at this point is lodged in your chest or throat) and with the engine running. Thanks Citroen! So I am hoping that is not the culprit. Although thinking this through, that is looking more and more likely (contact points stuck open hence electroswitch never gets energised when gearstick goes to neutral). Of course, the electroswitch solenoid could simply be not working and thus not redirecting the fluid flow away from the pressure plate.
So many possible points of failure! And all a bit tricky to diagnose at least for an amateur. We did replace the normally open relay (a 30 amp Narva 68024j a couple of years ago so it 'shouldn't' be that. Some fun time ahead of me. Just had one thought, I think I can test if the contact switch is the culprit by bypassing it with a 'hotwire' that earths the circuit, which is what the switch should do ONLY when in neutral, and see if that release the clutch. Theory of that seems sound to me although it is hard to hold all of this design in your head at one time. At least it means I wouldn't have to deep dive into it if it is not the culprit. Hmmm
cheers Leconte
Edit: the testing point on the torque converter takes a standard 6mm threaded bolt (pitch is same as buying a 6mm bolt from bunnings so whatever that is 1mm or 1.25 can check later). So need a 6mm takeoff there To 1/4 inch at gauge.
For those interested in my underlying problem:
At present we cannot engage any gears in the GS with the engine running (a slight deficiency as you would acknowledge) because of some flaw in the "hydraulically automated clutch" or 'Convertisseur' setup (hybrid auto-manual gearbox with friction clutch operated by hydraulics switched by gear lever movements, no clutch pedal).
The electrical side consists of a set of contact switches at the gearbox that provide an earth path which is 'open' (not conducting) when the car is in gear and closed (conducting to earth) when car (gearstick) is in neutral; this circuit runs via a normally open relay (and the ignition switch) to provide current to the famous 'Electroswitch' which is a hydraulic solenoid that switches torque converter fluid (driven by an internal pump) between two flow states: 1. pressurising the hydraulic clutch (unable to change gear) when in gear with the electroswitch NOT energised (a spring returns an internal rod to the position where fluid flows to pressurise the pressure plate) and 2: de-pressurising the clutch when in neutral (allowing the gears to be changed) - in this case the contact switches on the gearbox should be closed and the relay energised which should energise the electroswitch solenoid, pushing the distribution rod to the position where the hydraulic fluid bypasses the pressure plate allowing the clutch springs to decouple the motor from the gearbox, hence gears may be changed.
It is possible there is a flaw in the electrics that means the electroswitch is not getting switched on when in neutral to activate depressurise mode, or it is possible something is wrong with the fluid side.
A pressure gauge can be plugged into the torque converter to check the pressure from the gear driven internal eccentric pump. If the pump has failed or the pressure is not high enough then the factory instruction is to basically replace the whole torque converter unit (as long as a small filter is not blocked which I believe isn't). Hence wanting to check the pressure to hopefully rule out a major issue.
On the electrical side, and being a Citroen, of course, the contact switch box is tiny (about the size of a matchbox) with a delicate mechanism consisting of 4 sets of points - one for each gear 1,2,3 and R - and mounted on a practically inaccessible spot behind the motor/Gearbox in the gear lever tunnel area and only able to be checked (under the bonnet not from inside the car) by removing the gear stick assembly and lying on top of the engine And somehow still changing gear by the stub out of the gearbox (which at this point is lodged in your chest or throat) and with the engine running. Thanks Citroen! So I am hoping that is not the culprit. Although thinking this through, that is looking more and more likely (contact points stuck open hence electroswitch never gets energised when gearstick goes to neutral). Of course, the electroswitch solenoid could simply be not working and thus not redirecting the fluid flow away from the pressure plate.
So many possible points of failure! And all a bit tricky to diagnose at least for an amateur. We did replace the normally open relay (a 30 amp Narva 68024j a couple of years ago so it 'shouldn't' be that. Some fun time ahead of me. Just had one thought, I think I can test if the contact switch is the culprit by bypassing it with a 'hotwire' that earths the circuit, which is what the switch should do ONLY when in neutral, and see if that release the clutch. Theory of that seems sound to me although it is hard to hold all of this design in your head at one time. At least it means I wouldn't have to deep dive into it if it is not the culprit. Hmmm
cheers Leconte
Last edited: