Do you ever brake in the rain ? Do you ever go around corners ? I tried to save a few bucks on the latest 2 tyres I bought and put mid spec Dunlops on instead of Conti's - worst mistake ever. The Dunlops are as close to dangerous as I've ever had a tyre - the grip on 1000km old Dunlops is certainly far, far worse than bald CSC's. My wife recently had trouble doing a hill start up a local hill because the Dunlops couldn't get traction - I thought that a little strange and so took the car out myself - first round-a-bout I nearly speared off the road they were so bad in the wet. I checked the tyre pressures with 3 different tyre gauges to be sure.
Justin
For those who find this puzzling, the story is as follows:
Generally speaking, the tread pattern is just there to get the rubber in contact with the road. If the road is merely slick & not (aquaplane-threatening) streaming wet, then a worn tyre that is compounded to interlock with the micro peaks & valleys of the road surface can grip better than a less worn but differently compounded tyre. It's all a matter of breaking the water film & gaining mechanical interlocking. Assuming a lack of aquaplaning, the only tread elements that assist here are sipes & block edges, not void volume.
Mind you, compounds age & change nature with time &, by the time a tyre's bald, its compound might no longer carry out this interlocking function very well.
Continental seem to currently be very good indeed at compounding & their tyres generally achieve that interlocking well. Moreover, they seem to have managed the chemistry such that the compound degradation slope over time is not steep. So, the good wet performance of the worn Continental SportContacts is not surprising.
Mind you, even if fitting two & with two SC3 already on it, I'd go for the SC5 & not the SC3 (& put the new ones on the back). It's a notably better tyre & would be a better basis for a new matched set of 4.
cheers! Peter
Last edited: